Max Basing vs Raul Brancaccio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 02:51 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Basing vs R. Brancaccio

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Basing 1 - 0 Brancaccio
They have played 2 sets in total, with Max Basing winning 2 and Raul Brancaccio winning 0. The last match between Max Basing and Raul Brancaccio was at the Hersonissos 6 Challenger, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Max Basing getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Basing | 1 |
Brancaccio | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Hersonissos 6 Challenger(10-14-25)
M. Basing vs R. Brancaccio H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $119,520 |
68.47% (76-35) | Career Total W/L | 57.49% (380-281) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
5 | Titles | 9 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Basing vs R. Brancaccio Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Raul Brancaccio winning 45.80% of points, outperforming Max Basing, who wins 39.28%.
- In return game statistics, Brancaccio secures 45.42% of opponent's second serve points, compared to Basing’s 42.97%.
- For first serve returns, Brancaccio is slightly behind with 29.65% against Basing's 30.27%.
- When facing pressure, Brancaccio has saved 52.47% of breakpoints, while Basing's rate is 47.58%.
- Over the past year, Brancaccio won 55.38% of matches (36-29), but Basing has a higher win rate of 82.35% (28-6).
- Both players excel on hard surfaces with a 62% win rate, though Basing struggles more on clay at 43%.
- In terms of match level, Brancaccio competes mostly in Challengers/ITF, winning 51.28% (20-19), whereas Basing dominates Futures/Satellites/ITF at 82.76% (24-5).
- What about opponent quality? Brancaccio faces players with an average rank of 414.15 compared to Basing's 416.35.
- In deciding sets, Brancaccio wins 35%, but Basing's 71% win rate makes him strong in tight situations.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance and game statistics, Raul Brancaccio has shown a superior second serve performance and the ability to win more return points on his opponent's second serve. This edge suggests a potential advantage in longer rallies and critical points.
However, Max Basing boasts an impressive overall win percentage over the past year, particularly excelling in deciding sets, indicating his resilience in pressure situations. Despite slightly lower second serve stats, his effective handling of first serve returns signifies a balanced game approach.
Both players have a strong performance on hard courts, but match-level exposure and competition consistency seem to favor Basing, who has demonstrated steady success in the Futures circuit.
While Brancaccio's ability to save breakpoints is commendable, Basing’s superior record in tightly contested matches positions him as the likely winner for this upcoming match based on current form and competitive resilience.
Max Basing vs Raul Brancaccio Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Basing vs R. Brancaccio H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 7 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:22:50 | Average Match Time | 1:22:50 |
71% (41/58) | 1st Serve % | 51% (28/55) |
61% (25/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (15/28) |
41% (7/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (3/9) |
53% (29/55) | Return Points Win % | 45% (26/58) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Basing Recent Matches Played
R. Brancaccio Recent Matches Played

M. Basing vs R. Brancaccio Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
69.09% (76/34) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.49% (380/281) |
63.93% (156/88) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.93% (863/653) |
55.60% (1242/992) | Games Win/Loss | 53.38% (7396/6459) |
73.03% (65/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.95% (64/41) |
42.86% (6/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.45% (287/204) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.16% (28/34) |
71.43% (5/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
66 | Aces Total | 1096 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
181 | Total Double Faults | 1873 |
1:17:59 | Average Match Time | 1:24:28 |
421.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 472.44 |
71% (3906/5500) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24439/39455) |
66% (2568/3906) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (16041/24439) |
52% (833/1594) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7231/15016) |
48% (303/627) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2082/4580) |
44% (2396/5450) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17449/40414) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
81.82% (9/2) | Challenger W/L | 50.69% (146/142) |
67.68% (67/32) | Futures W/L | 65.03% (225/121) |
69% (73/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (372/650) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
64% (14/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (90/166) |
75% (21/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (89/195) |
93% (71/66) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (381/332) |
7% (71/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (381/48) |
23% (39/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (280/47) |